When Facebook was first introduced to college students in
2004, it had a purpose and a target. College students could connect and share
images and messages. Over time, the Facebook demographic widened, no longer
requiring college emails but opening it up to anyone. This still only appealed
to youth, but over time businesses caught on and in turn older generations. Pokes
and pictures were followed by gift giving, pages, apps, music, notes and Zynga online
games. In 2012 there were over one billion active users from across the globe. And
now, everyone hates it. Why?
The service hasn’t necessarily changed. Sure, ads are now a
concern, timeline has been introduced and soon Graph Search will supposedly
change everything again, but the concept of promoting yourself and sharing
content remains the same.
What’s different is the culture surrounding Facebook. They
are no longer the only big fish in the tank, and more than that, users are no
longer intrigued with simply being somewhere.
Facebook is the early generation of mass adopters. For that
reason, they contain everyone, especially those that don’t know why they’re
there. From there, more specific platforms were developed for a specific
purpose: Twitter focuses on syndicating content in under 140 characters,
Instagram beautifies our ugly faces, LinkedIn promotes our professional
experience—all of this is in ADDITION to networking.
Networking, the act of connecting and maintaining a presence,
is no longer a reason to be somewhere. You need a message or reason for being
there. Businesses that have succeeded on social networks know this. And users
are not close behind.
There was a time when being everywhere was a must—both for
businesses and affluent users of social media. But now there has finally
reached a level of saturation in the marketplace. Smart businesses aren’t
blindly following competitors onto platforms that don’t contain their target
demographic or conform to the restrictions of their brand. Users with clout
aren’t on a network because their friends are—they’re there for a focused purpose.
And this purpose can be fun. SnapChat, a photo/video
messaging application that automatically deletes after a few seconds, is a
perfect example of this. While light-years from the growth issues of Facebook,
they’ve zeroed in on a fundamental craving for social sharing without
responsibility and exploded their following. It’s simple, focused and it works.
LinkedIn has been incredibly successful because of how
necessary and focused its service is. It has added many widgets to improve
connectivity and professional validity but also has done an excellent job
listening to their audience when their additions rock the boat too hard.
Usability is clutch, and not losing focus on why your
platform exists.
People feel guilty being somewhere without purpose. Without it
we dwell on ourselves and call each other narcissists, when really people are
and always have been narcissistic; they just don’t want to feel like they are.
Purpose gives us that veil.
So where did Facebook go wrong? Who the hell knows, however,
it’s notable to mention Facebook has gotten larger and not necessarily more
relevant to our lives. Their purpose has remained stagnant while the culture
has shifted. And adding more widgets onto its platform has not changed its
purpose. In fact, it’s damaged its previous one. By adding so many functions to
a platform, it has created an all consuming monster of information that is slow,
spammy and above all, segments user purpose. And like any good marketer will
tell you, too many choices cost you bottom line.
No comments:
Post a Comment